Last week, a Belize City newspaper featured an advertisement requesting public
consultation on Belize's National Report to the World Summit on Sustainable
Development. The ad seeks public feedback on the draft document being submitted
by government in the following main areas: "1) An analysis of the National
Planning Process for Sustainable Development and Its Implementation, and 2)
Identification of National Critical Issues as well as New and Emerging Critical
Issues." Is this just so much more propaganda
or does the Government of Belize really care what the public thinks? Below is
one specific "National Critical Issue" that was analyzed and identified for this
consultation. More than ten years ago, the Proposed
Ambergris Caye Master Plan was drafted at great expense. Much planning and
forethought went into this multi-page document - a dedicated tribute to the
"sustainable development" of our island. Part three on dredging reads Dredging will be defined in general terms, as the movement of soil.
Whenever this is done, whether by a Dredger, an excavating machine or manually,
it must be done in a manner so as not to adversely affect the stability of the
beach and the coastline. In the context of San Pedro, no such works will be
permitted on the eastern side of the island except temporary works (when
properly justified) provided such works adhere to the principles of maintaining
the equilibrium of the beach profile and its ecology, is designed and supervised
by competent professionals, and a guarantee in the form of a bond or otherwise
is made by the executing agency to allow the authority to undertake corrective
works in the event of default by the executing agency. As a rule of thumb, this
amount will be three times the cost/value (whichever is greater) of the works to
be done. Following the destruction of
Hurricane Keith, dredging was permitted for the sole purpose of reclaiming beach
on public lands - for the sake of the community and the tourism industry. This
permission was corrupted and abused by some, resulting in illegal dredging. The
high retail value of this pearly white commodity (sand from the front of the
island) and the beautification of private property (purchased or for sale) were
the elements driving this illegal activity. In July and
August of 2001, The San Pedro Sun dedicated a
front page spot for five weeks to address island concerns regarding dredging (or
land reclamation as it is referred). Much effort was put into these articles in
an attempt to inform readers of the dangers of, and damage to the reef and
coastal areas that is caused by this extraction process. Most of the dredging
that was happening then was illegal but there was no monitoring of these
operations by government agencies. And the dredging
continued. On
July 4, 2001, all the proper authorities visited the island at the request and
expense of the San Pedro Town Council (SPTC) and the Ambergris Caye Planning
Committee (ACPC) to investigate this illegal dredging. Councilors, and members
of the ACPC, Departments of Environment (DOE), Geology and Petroleum, and Lands
and Survey, as well as Coastal Zone Management Authority/Institute (CZMA/I) were
joined by non-governmental organizations including Green Reef and the San Pedro
Tourist Guide Association (SPTGA) to view the damage done to the coastal waters
and terrain of Ambergris Caye. All
agencies involved agreed that dredging permits were issued to all the sites for
the purpose of "reclamation of lands lost due to the devastation of Hurricane
Keith." It was further reported that almost none of the dredging operations complied with the terms specified on the
permit. Reportedly, budget cuts in the Ministry of Natural Resources and the
Environment had led to a lack of manpower and the resources needed to monitor
these situations. As a result of this meeting, the general consensus was that
until more resources were made available, the SPTC, with help from Green Reef
and the San Pedro Tourist Guides Association would aid in the monitoring so
badly needed. Collectively, it was agreed that dredging
should no longer take place on the windward side of the island. The dredging that was taking place at that time was, according to the
developer, to be finished by August 10, 2001. That was the plan, so what about the
implementation? Here we are almost a year later facing the
same situation, or maybe worse. A young man died after crashing into a dredge.
The dredging continues. More and more complaints are voiced. The dredging
continues. Silt is beginning to cover our most important natural resource - the
barrier reef. The dredging continues. Fish, turtles, rays and other important
marine creatures are losing their habitats. The dredging continues. Popular dive
sites where tourists once explored our beautiful waters are disappearing. Still,
the dredging continues on the front (eastern) side of Ambergris Caye, but it
would appear there is nothing anyone can or will do about it.
The tour guides have held up their end of the bargain.
Reportedly, they have monitored and met twice with the Department of Geology and
Petroleum Department and twice with CZMA/I in the recent past. Green Reef and
Coastal Zone have also reportedly been in contact with other monitoring
agencies. And the dredging continues. Most of the
departments in the Ministry of Natural Resources have been contacted and are
aware of this dredging. Nearly all of these hardworking, educated men and women
truly care about "sustainable development" and try to do the jobs they are paid
to perform. Only Geology and Petroleum has the authority to sign permits for
dredging. The others are paid to monitor and uphold the laws, and attempt to
"sustain" our natural resources during "development". Why pay all of these
people to do a job they obviously, in the end, have absolutely no control over?
It seems the only concern when it comes to granting permission to dredge is the
almighty dollar. Money and greed win out 90% of the time. And the dredging
continues. Approval from the town for the
current dredging operation is a result of a land deal (for a recreational park)
and road-building agreement made between the developer and the town. "Better to
get something out of it; government will allow it to happen anyway," stated the
Mayor when this was questioned. In defense of the Mayor, this is true, since
another dredging operation has just been completed without town approval and
without any benefit whatsoever to the town. But, is this the way things should
happen? Should the dredging continue? The terms
"government accountability," and "sustainable development" should not be
oxymorons. "Developers must develop for the sake of development." "We must
support our growing tourism industry." These are statements heard over and over.
What will developers do when there is nothing more to dredge? What will everyone do when there are no more natural resources
to sustain our tourism industry? Ambergris Caye residents will need another
industry to "sustain" them when the fishing and tourism industries are
destroyed. And the dredging continues. The time is at
hand. It is apparent that many local individuals and organizations are aware and
outraged over the "raping" of Ambergris Caye (and now Caye Caulker) and are "fed
up" with the irresponsible destruction of our natural resources for private as
well as government gain. The aforementioned advertisement regarding public input
on Belize's National Report to the World Summit on Sustainable Development
instructs the participant to download documents from the "What's New" page on
the ministry's website: http://www.mnrei.gov.bz and
complete the feedback form. Or, you can post your comments on the ministry's
web-board which can be accessed from the On-Line Conferences page of the
website. The closing date for public comments is June 30,
2002. And the dredging
continues.
|